Friday, November 15, 2013
Wednesday, September 4, 2013
Adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond's book: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat http://www.amazon.com/Slavery-Terrorism-Islam-Peter-Hammond/dp/1612154980
Islam is not a religion, nor is it a cult. In its fullest form, it is a complete, total, 100% system of life.
Islam has religious, legal, political, economic, social, and military components. The religious component is a beard for all of the other components.
Islamization begins when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to agitate for their religious privileges.
When politically correct, tolerant, and culturally diverse societies agree to Muslim demands for their religious privileges, some of the other components tend to creep in as well.
Here's how it works.
As long as the Muslim population remains around or under 2% in any given country, they will be for the most part be regarded as a peace-loving minority, and not as a threat to other citizens. This is the case in:
United States -- Muslim 0.6%
Australia -- Muslim 1.5%
Canada -- Muslim 1.9%
China -- Muslim 1.8%
Italy -- Muslim 1.5%
Norway -- Muslim 1.8%
At 2% to 5%, they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups, often with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs. This is happening in:
Denmark -- Muslim 2%
Germany -- Muslim 3.7%
United Kingdom -- Muslim 2.7%
Spain -- Muslim 4%
Thailand -- Muslim 4.6%
>From 5% on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. For example, they will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature halal on their shelves -- along with threats for failure to comply. This is occurring in:
France -- Muslim 8%
Philippines -- Muslim 5%
Sweden -- Muslim 5%
Switzerland -- Muslim 4.3%
The Netherlands -- Muslim 5.5%
Trinidad & Tobago -- Muslim 5.8%
At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves (within their ghettos) under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islamists is to establish Sharia law over the entire world.
When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. In Paris , we are already seeing car-burnings. Any non-Muslim action offends Islam, and results in uprisings and threats, such as in Amsterdam , with opposition to Mohammed cartoons and films about Islam. Such tensions are seen daily, particularly in Muslim sections, in:
Guyana -- Muslim 10%
India -- Muslim 13.4%
Israel -- Muslim 16%
Kenya -- Muslim 10%
Russia -- Muslim 15%
After reaching 20%, nations can expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings, and the burnings of Christian churches and Jewish synagogues, such as in:
Ethiopia -- Muslim 32.8%
At 40%, nations experience widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks, and ongoing militia warfare, such as in:
Bosnia -- Muslim 40%
Chad -- Muslim 53.1%
Lebanon -- Muslim 59.7%
From 60%, nations experience unfettered persecution of non-believers of all other religions (including non-conforming Muslims), sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon, and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels, such as in:
Albania -- Muslim 70%
Malaysia -- Muslim 60.4%
Qatar -- Muslim 77.5%
Sudan -- Muslim 70%
After 80%, expect daily intimidation and violent jihad, some State-run ethnic cleansing, and even some genocide, as these nations drive out the infidels, and move toward 100% Muslim, such as has been experienced and in some ways is on-going in:
Bangladesh -- Muslim 83%
Egypt -- Muslim 90%
Gaza -- Muslim 98.7%
Indonesia -- Muslim 86.1%
Iran -- Muslim 98%
Iraq -- Muslim 97%
Jordan -- Muslim 92%
Morocco -- Muslim 98.7%
Pakistan -- Muslim 97%
Palestine -- Muslim 99%
Syria -- Muslim 90%
Tajikistan -- Muslim 90%
Turkey -- Muslim 99.8%
United Arab Emirates -- Muslim 96%
100% will usher in the peace of 'Dar-es-Salaam' -- the Islamic House of Peace. Here there's supposed to be peace, because everybody is a Muslim, the Madrasses are the only schools, and the Koran is the only word, such as in:
Afghanistan -- Muslim 100%
Saudi Arabia -- Muslim 100%
Somalia -- Muslim 100%
Yemen -- Muslim 100%
Unfortunately, peace is never achieved, as in these 100% states the most radical Muslims intimidate and spew hatred, and satisfy their blood lust by killing less radical Muslims, for a variety of reasons.
'Before I was nine I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was me against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; the tribe against the world, and all of us against the infidel. -- Leon Uris, 'The Haj'
It is important to understand that in some countries, with well under 100% Muslim populations, such as France, the minority Muslim populations live in ghettos, within which they are 100% Muslim, and within which they live by Sharia Law. The national police do not even enter these ghettos. There are no national courts, nor schools, nor non-Muslim religious facilities. In such situations, Muslims do not integrate into the community at large. The children attend madrasses. They learn only the Koran. To even associate with an infidel is a crime punishable with death. Therefore, in some areas of certain nations, Muslim Imams and extremists exercise more power than the national average would indicate.
Today's 1.5 billion Muslims make up 22% of the world's population. But their birth rates dwarf the birth rates of Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, Jews, and all other believers. Muslims will exceed 50% of the world's population by the end of this century.
Learn more about the False Prophet and End-Times events at ComeOutOfHerMyPeople.com
Saturday, August 17, 2013
Charles Spurgeon contemporary of John Nelson DarbyJohn Darby's ideas formed the foundation upon which the pre-tribulation rapture (Left Behind) doctrine stands. The following quote is taken from a post that Charles Spurgeon's grandson, Tommie Spurgean, posted on his own website in order to awaken Darby's followers to the fact that the Baptist Movement had initially rejected Darby's proposals, and today it has chosen to honor Darby instead of Spurgeon when it comes to eschatology.
Charles Spurgeon and End-time Prophecy“Charles Spurgeon believed that the Baptist faith was exactly the same as the early Church under the Apostles and he taught that. Yet today if he was applying for a job as a pastor in a Baptist church and he told them how he believed about the Rapture and the Resurrection he would be rejected. His scriptural understanding and messages are praised by many and they often place him at the top of the list for their spiritual leadership. But there are things in Prophecy that he taught that the Baptist would reject as heresy. One of the reasons many do not know what CH Spurgeon taught on Prophecy was the fact that he never preached in direct messages such as a sermon on the rapture or end times. But we know what he believed by what he included in his messages of salvation and enlightenment because he often included his belief in prophecy in the message itself rather than it being the main topic of his sermon.
What most believers do not know is that Charles Spurgeon believed that the Rapture and Resurrection would happen at the same time following the Great Tribulation. That the judgement seat of Christ would happen and Satan would be bond for a thousand years He also believed that Jesus would then literally set up his kingdom on earth and rule for a thousand years. He believed that a second resurrection would occur after the thousand-year reign for the unrighteous dead. This would be followed by the great white throne judgement of God and then there would be a new heaven and a new earth.
During Spurgeon’s day there was another preacher that people today believe was a knowledgeable man on prophecy. His name was John Darby. It is amazing to me that the Baptist organization would accept his teachings over Charles Spurgeon. Charles did not care for the teachings of Darby and if he were alive today would be preaching in direct opposition to him. He did it back then and he would continue to do it today. What I am referring to is the belief that the Rapture and Resurrection would occur before the tribulation. How could anyone believe that Darby had a greater understanding than what CH Spurgeon did? Spurgeon was not ignorant when it came to prophetic teachings and took them just as serious as his teachings on grace because he wanted his listeners to know the truth. However his main focus was on the cross of Christ and Salvation because he felt that it was more important than prophecy, however he did include prophecy teachings in his preaching and teaching. He did not reject end-time prophecy or think that it was wrong to be enlightened by it.”
An article at www.spurgeon.org/mainpage.html had the following to say:
· Charles Haddon Spurgeon, Pastor of the Metropolitan Tabernacle and contemporary of Darby published criticism of Darby and Brethrenism. His main criticism was that Darby and the Plymouth Brethren rejected the vicarious purpose of Christ's obedience as well as imputed righteousness. He viewed these of such importance and so central to the gospel that it led him to this statement about the rest of their belief. "With the deadly heresies entertained and taught by the Plymouth Brethren, in relation to some of the most momentous of all the doctrines of the gospel, and to which I have adverted at some length, I feel assured that my readers will not be surprised at any other views, however unscriptural and pernicious they may be, which the Darbyites have embraced and zealously seek to propagate"
“Another thing that Charles Spurgeon rejected about John Darby was his teachings on dispensationalism. This belief teaches that the Jews are under a different covenant than the one we have to day and do not need to be saved through the preaching of the Gospel the same as the Gentiles. He believed that when Jesus came back he would rule over them in Jerusalem but they would be saved by their own covenant with him. At that time dispensationalism taught that Israel would not go back to the land of Palestine until Jesus returned at Armageddon. Charles Spurgeon disagreed with their teaching and said that he believed that the Jews would return to the land of Palestine before Jesus came back. He was right and John Darby was wrong. Charles also taught that the Jews had to be saved through the Gospel of Jesus Christ and that many would be born-again before Jesus came back. Clarence Larkin came along after Darby and improved upon his theory of dispensationalism by including that 144,000 Jews would be saved during the tribulation but the rest would not accept Jesus until he comes back. Charles Spurgeon would have rejected this as well.
This issue may not seem to be important to some but it is very important to me and those that are trying to reach the Jews with the Gospel of Jesus Christ. What I would like to point out is that most churches believe John Darby and Clarence Larkin over Charles Spurgeon. Charles Spurgeon in our day couldn’t be licensed or perform any duties in any church such as Baptist, Assembly of God, Church of God, Methodist, etc because he didn’t believe that the Rapture would occur before the Tribulation. There were many more great men of God in his day and before that did not accept that and wouldn’t accept it to this very day. Why does it matter? There are over 13million Jews in the world today that need to hear the Gospel of Jesus Christ. The modern day teaching of pretribulation rapture and the teachings on dispensationalism prevent a very large number of Christians from even praying that the Jews will be saved. It is interesting to note that many evangelicals are supportive to Israel because they want to be blessed by doing so, but they are only interested in blessing Israel in material ways, not spiritual. Their salvation is very important and Satan has thrown up a smoke screen to keep Christians from seeking God for Israel’s salvation. The Scriptures teach us that it is our responsibility to reach Israel with the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
The churches in America are so dug into dispensation teachings that they would not allow Spurgeon or any other great man of God to pastor or preach in any of their churches. I am amazed at that. In fact many churches will run off members that do not agree with it or peer-pressure a person until they are afraid of not being accepted unless they do. We do not realize how anti-Semitic this is.
John Hagee will tell you that to preach the Gospel to the Jews is a waste of time. Yet if you were to tell people such as Jews for Jesus or other Jews that have been born again you would soon realize how ridiculous this is. Their souls are as important as any Gentile and we should realize it. It took me a long time to realize why people like John Hagee and others could be so hard when it comes to the Jews and salvation? Now I realize that they are defending what they were taught in Bible College being taught dispensation teachings. They don’t want to lose their license. By the way John Hagee does have a great concern when it comes to protecting the lives of the Jews and I appreciate what he is doing with defending Israel. But it is very important that while we protect the sinner that we provide the Gospel for their souls as well and not teach against it. The teaching of pre-tribulation Rapture leaves the Jews out of the Rapture because most will be saved during the Tribulation period itself and the Bible is clear on this. But they will have to receive the Gospel from us, the Gentiles. There are only two Resurrections in Scripture; one when Jesus comes back and the other at the end of the millenium for the unrighteous dead. The Rapture and Resurrection occur at the same time in the same moment. If we miss the Rapture there will be no eternal life because we won’t be changed. To leave the Jews out of this and to say that God prefers us over them is anti-Semitic and a sin.
The reason that I am telling the Church about all of these things is not to be critical of others but to open the eyes of Church to do what God has called us to do. It is try to get others to pray for the salvation of Israel whether their pastors do or not. If the pastor wants to pray for the salvation of Israel that is more than great but if he opposes it we need to do what we know is right in our hearts and not worry about it. I would like to encourage everyone especially Baptist to search their hearts and ask themselves whether they believe John Darby or CH Spurgeon when it comes to Biblical truth. God Bless You.”
Your Brother in Christ,
Free PDF: http://www.comeoutofhermypeople.com/images/Why_Most_Christians_Believe_in_a_Post_Tribulation_Rapture_-_PDF_compressed_05062016.pdf
Set your own price: https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/631389
Amazon Kindle: https://www.amazon.com/Most-Christians-Believe-Post-Tribulation-Rapture-ebook/dp/B01ELQDL5E
Saturday, August 10, 2013
Abominations that Bring Desolations
History shows that mankind in general has always found homosexuality to be repulsive, offensive, and a behavior to be inhibited by condemnation and punishment.
The following is an excerpt from Come Out of Her My People: Persecution Begins
Homosexuality is another abomination that will justify America’s desolation. No one could read through the Bible and conclude that the practice of homosexuality is not a sin. It is called “an abomination” in the Mosaic law. Sodom was destroyed for its sodomy. The tribe of Benjamin faced extinction because of this sin. And it is found among specifically mentioned sins in the New Testament. But for a society which has been overtaken by the sins of fornication and adultery, the sin of homosexuality has come to be tolerated. Now some states have even sanctioned the practice of tempting little school-age children with this sin under the guise of diversification education. Even the Church itself has become unwilling to admit that the Bible speaks out against homosexuality.
We hear the statement more and more, “Well the Bible doesn’t really say that homosexuality is wrong.” This is a lie. The fact that this lie is so pervasive can only lead to the conclusion that people aren’t reading their Bibles. We are about to study a section of scripture which speaks out so vehemently against this sin that the reader might be shocked by the severity of God’s condemnation. Homosexuality is not the only sin which is exposed by Romans Chapter One. Homosexuality is, however, the most explicitly described in Romans Chapter One, Verses 24 through 28.
Before we examine those verses we need to understand their context. What we find in the following verses is that God’s wrath is revealed by the gospel; and that He utterly condemns every form of ungodliness. But in order to honor man’s God-given free will, God allows people who reject Him to commit the destructive sins that they desire. This, however, doesn’t mean that God’s attitude toward those sins has changed. The Bible also says that, “The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament shows His handiwork.”-Psalms 19:1 God says He has made His creation in such a way that He cannot be denied – that He can only be ignored. The consequence for ignoring the Creator, who is also the Sustainer, is to be given over to corruption; the opposite of being sustained. We have the choice to be sustained, or to be corrupted.
18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, 19 because what may be known of God is manifest in them, for God has shown it to them. 20 For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse, 21 because, although they knew God, they did not glorify Him as God, nor were thankful, but became futile in their thoughts, and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22 Professing to be wise, they became fools, 23 and changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like corruptible man—and birds and four-footed animals and creeping things.
Three times in the next verses, God uses the term “given over.” God is going to let them have it! Because they’re worshipping corruptible man, God is going to “give them over” to corrupt their own bodies among themselves. “Among themselves” distinguishes this behavior from an act of sin that is carried out alone. This could be the first reference to the sin of homosexuality. And then, because they exchanged the truth for a lie, God “gives them over” to self-destruction. And thirdly, because they don’t want to think about God, He “gives them over” to a debased mind. So let’s read verses 24 through 28; and then we will look at the Greek words from the original manuscripts in order to understand precisely what is being said.
“24 Therefore God also gave them up to uncleanness, in the lusts of their hearts, to dishonor their bodies among themselves, 25 who exchanged the truth of God for the lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen. 26 For this reason God gave them up to vile passions. For even their women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature. 27 Likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust for one another, men with men committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which was due. 28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a debased mind, to do those things which are not fitting; 29 being filled with all unrighteousness, sexual immorality, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, evil-mindedness; they are whisperers, 30 backbiters, haters of God, violent, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, 31 undiscerning, untrustworthy, unloving, unforgiving, unmerciful; 32 who, knowing the righteous judgment of God, that those who practice such things are deserving of death, not only do the same but also approve of those who practice them.”
Verses 29 through 32 are included so that we might recognize that all of these things are evidence that people are not worshiping Creator God as they should. They’re not serving Him. They’re not acknowledging Him. They’re not thinking about Him, or glorifying Him in their lives.
The opening verses of Chapter Two drives home the fact that no one is pleasing God perfectly by their desires, their thoughts, or their behavior. Without the redeeming work of Jesus we would all be disapproved by God. But praise be to God’s grace by which He has made us accepted in His Beloved Son!
Now let’s go back to verse 24 and observe how strongly God condemns the sin of homosexuality. If you are reading the electronic version, you may click on the Greek words and go directly to Strong’s Online.
“Therefore God also gave them up to uncleanness (ἀκαθαρσίαν (akatharsian) uncleaness).” Katharas means clean, or pure. So, “a-katharas” means not clean or pure, indicating filth or defilement. So, God gave them up to be dirty and defiled. In the Old Testament, anyone defiled was disqualified to serve before God in the tabernacle, and later in the
“in the lusts (ἐπιθυμίαις (epithymiais) desires) of their hearts.” Epithumia is a strong desire –in this case in a bad sense. So it means an irregular or inordinate desire.
“to dishonor (ἀτιμάζεσθαι (atimazesthai) to be dishonored) their bodies” Atomotzo is another Greek word that uses an alpha prefix to express the antonym of the word. Here the root word is timao: to honor or give honor. Timothy means God honorer; from timao and Theo. (A)- tomotzo means; to dishonor, to treat with indignity, or to abuse.
“among themselves” I think it’s interesting that it adds “among themselves” because it points to an inward or private focus, a selfish aspect. “Among themselves” gives the impression of a separate group which exists apart from the whole of humanity. They have gone off by themselves and they interact only among their own kind – those who have rejected God.
“who exchanged the truth of God for the lie (ψεύδει (pseudei) falsehood), and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen.” The word for “lie” is pseude. Pseudei is translated “falsehood”. Everyone believes in something. They can either believe the truth of God, or they can believe in something else. But here we are talking about the truth of God vs. the falsehood. The Father of all truths, vs. the father of all lies. The context of the prior verses indicates that the truth is the fact that God IS – as God has given His name as “I Am,” or “I Exist”. The lie would then be that God is not – the denial of God’s existence or the willful ignorance of God.
“For this reason God gave them up to vile (ἀτιμίας (atimias) of dishonor) passions (πάθη (pathē) passions)” The word for passions is pathe. It is the root from which we get the English word “pathology” - the study of disease. Notice how derogatorily it is used in Colossian 3:5, “Therefore put to death your members which are on the earth: fornication, uncleanness, passion (πάθος (pathos) passion), evil desire, and covetousness, which is idolatry.” Greek scholar Spiros Zodiates describes “pathe” as a diseased condition of the soul, from which the outwardly expressed defilements spring forth. They emanate from this diseased condition. But in Romans 1:26, pathe is further modified by the word atimias. We learned above that timao means; to honor. Therefore a-timias means “degrading.” So the compound rendered in English as “vile passion” is properly interpreted as “degrading unhealthy desires.” The pathe atimias describes a diseased lust which dishonors those that indulge in it. It is a self-destructive mechanism which degrades the perpetrator just as the homosexual has chosen to degrade God.
“For even their women exchanged the natural (φυσικὴν (physikēn) natural) use for what is against (παρὰ (para) against) nature(φύσιν (physin) nature) . Likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman”
This is the most explicit description of homosexuality found in the Bible. Some people have said that the Bible doesn’t say anything about homosexuality. It may not use the English word, but what would they call men burning with lust for other men? The Greek in this passage is self -explanatory. Homosexuality is para fusen; “against nature.” It is paranormal. It is not instinctive. Isn’t it peculiar that the same society which is so concerned about nature would embrace an activity that is contrary to nature?
“burned (ἐξεκαύθησαν (exekauthēsan) were inflamed)in their lust (ὀρέξει (orexei) desire) for one another” Here the word for lust is not epithomia . This time Paul uses a form of orexis. This word comes from orego. It means to reach for, or to grab.
“Men with men committing what is shameful (ἀσχημοσύνην (aschēmosynēn) shame)” Askemeneo is a very unusual word. It is used in the Greek Septuagint in Leviticus 18:16. The verse reads, “Thou shalt not uncover the nakedness (askemeneo) of thy brother’s wife.” Here it literally means “to inappropriately expose someone’s private parts.” The word is translated here, politely in English, as “shameful.” God says that men being inflamed by other men is shameful.
and receiving in themselves the penalty (ἀντιμισθίαν (antimisthian) recompense) A misthos is a reward. An anti-misthos is just the opposite of a reward. It is a retribution. There’s a penalty attached to this shameful behavior.
“Of their error (πλάνης (planēs) error Note that this is not pseude, which was used above for “falsehood.” Plane is where we get the English word “planet.” It means to wander out of the way. So this “error” is a delusion, a deviation, or wrong opinion.
“which was due (ἔδει (edei) did it behove) (ἀπολαμβάνοντες (apolambanontes) receiving)” Edei is used to tell us that the penalty is just, certain, and appropriate for the offense. And just as men received other men, they will also receive the penalty.
“And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a debased mind (ἀδόκιμον (adokimon) a depraved)” The root word for depraved is dokomon meaning “approved.” It is akin to dokome, which is Greek for “character”. A-dokimon describes disapproved character. This could easily be a reference to men whose character has already been damaged as a result of the just reward which they have already received.
“to do those things which are not fitting (καθήκοντα (kathēkonta) fitting)” Katheko means “proper” or “right”. Kathekonta means “wrong” or “improper.”
So let’s summarize this section of Romans, which purportedly doesn’t say anything against homosexuality. God’s Word lists fourteen derogatory terms for the practice of homosexuality. They are: unclean, lustful, dishonoring, self-focused, based on a falsehood, degrading, from a self-destructive disease of the soul, against nature, a craving, shameful, deserves a penalty, the result of wandering off, degrading, and, not fitting (wrong). So in this little area we see this behavior thoroughly exposed and explicitly described as sin. Never let it be said that the Bible doesn’t speak out against homosexuality.
God speaks out very strongly against it. In fact, because it is the most explicitly described sin among the many sins listed in Romans Chapter One, homosexuality is the most obvious indicator that someone has stopped worshiping God as they should; that their heart has turned away from God, that they’re not serving God, and that they don’t want to think about God. No matter what they might say, this text tells us that in their hearts they do not even believe in the existence of God.
So why would a homosexual be appointed to model Christ to the Church? This is counter-productive to building up the body of Christ, to say the least. How could Christ be glorified by something shameful? It’s like promoting a card-carrying coward to the office of five-star general. This makes a mockery of the precious body of Christ. Simple logic would mandate that we not honor a behavior that is the most indicative of someone who is not honoring God. Nor may we approve of those who practice such things.
The approval of sin is a sin." - end excerpt
Thursday, August 8, 2013
Would a Sin by any Other Name Smell as Bad?
President Obama once again promotes sexual perversion above a nation's right to enforce Biblical standards - protecting citizens from objectionable and offensive behavior. http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/olympics/2013/08/07/barack-obama-comments-anti-gay-laws-sochi-russia-winter-olympics/2626591/
Russia is being accused of "disrespect" toward sexual practices which are illegal in most of the world.
Isn't it America who is being disrespectful of Russia's "right" to ensure public decency to its citizens? Don't the Russian people have a "right" to keep objectionable behavior from being flaunted in their own country?
Most normal people find homosexuality to be disgusting. That is precisely why this abnormal behavior was illegal in America just 30 years ago. It is actually disgusting that our president would stoop so low as to try to undermine morality in Africa - and now in Russia.
Laws come before rights.It's all about the battle between law, and lawlessness. Instead of Russia respecting the "rights" of sexual perverts, the U.S. should respect Russia's laws.
Governmental "authorities" that don't bow down to the immorality of the people have been brought down by the U.S. and the U.N. all over the world. Russia will get no peace from America until they yield to the demands of the godless West. Hopefully Russia will continue to stand for Biblical righteousness.
Learn why Satan, the ruler of this world, will persecute God's people in "Come Out of Her My People: Persecution Begins"
Tuesday, August 6, 2013
Russian Press pushing Christianity
Isn't it refreshing to see a country in the northern hemisphere standing up for Christ?
When was the last time you read an article like this in the Washington Post?
Russian Patriarch says gays destroy mankind
God always maintains a remnant somewhere on the planet. The lawless nations may take over in this world, but the kingdom of heaven has a King that "loves righteousness and hates lawlessness."
"Blessed is every one who fears the Lord, Who walks in His ways." - Psalm 128:1
Friday, August 2, 2013
"You have loved righteousness and hated lawlessness"The prince of peace loved righteousness and hated lawlessness. "God so loved the world that He gave his only begotten Son . . . " God loves you. But God is holy and He hates lawlessness. Psalm 85 puts these attributes of God together: "Mercy and truth have met together; Righteousness and peace have kissed." - Psalms 85:10
The new hate speechBut ungodly sinners have just the opposite response. The atheist liberals hate righteousness and love lawlessness. They call righteousness "Hate". Because righteousness is not in their vocabulary they use words like "fair" and "equal". They can't say "right", or "just", or "holy".
Stop Hating Righteousness and MoralityAmerican leaders are not the only people who are calling traditional morality an act of hatred. The United Nations is also spreading the same lie. http://www.foxnews.com/world/2013/07/26/un-human-rights-office-unveils-gay-rights-campaign/#ixzz2aAKW46L0
The U.S.S.AThe God-haters of the western nations don't seem to realize that accusing Russia of standing by godly principles is actually resulting in Russia being esteemed in the eyes of Western Christians. America appears to be transforming into a new U.S.S.R. And Russia is looking more and more like the great Christian nation that the United States used to be. Time will tell if Russia becomes a magnet for Christian refugees from the West.
Meanwhile - Russia continues to stand strong for righteousness. http://www.ctvnews.ca/sports/russia-will-enforce-anti-gay-rights-law-during-olympics-sports-minister-1.1393850
Thursday, August 1, 2013
At least the Russian Leadership is supporting the Church
People are wondering if the nation that saw the persecution of the Christian Church at the beginning of the twentieth century http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_Orthodox_Church ; and which now is highly populated by Muslims, will be able to return to the status of a "Christian Nation".
Russia certainly stands a better chance then the western nations, whose leaders are bent on destroying Christianity under the guise of "human rights" and "fairness." The western nations have lost control to special interest groups and United Nations' initiatives. Even the Roman Pope has bowed his knee and forsaken righteousness by accepting homosexuality.
It looks like the whole Western Schism has run astray. The abuse of authority by Rome and the rejection of authority by the Protestant kingdoms have both worked to destroy the basic concept of authority and tradition in the West. The Eastern Orthodox Churches may be the only Church that makes it to the finish line - the Lord's return.
While the Catholics and the Protestants have been duking it out by war and theological differences, the Eastern Orthodox Churches has maintained their foundations. We can only pray that God will give favor to those who bear the standard of Christ - as He did for Constantine at the Milvian Bridge.
Friday, July 26, 2013
Looking for the Image of the Beast?According to Daniel the beasts represent kingdoms (nations)
"The fourth beast shall be A fourth kingdom on earth, Which shall be different from all other kingdoms, And shall devour the whole earth, Trample it and break it in pieces." - Daniel 7:23
What is the image of a kingdom?The image of a kingdom or nation could only be some type of replication of a nation's laws or government. I would suggest that the United Nations has not only copied the name of the United States, but that it has also followed the U.S. down the road of humanism and wickedness.
This Fox News article is the latest evidence of the United Nations' oppression of nations that hold Christian values - or any traditional values. http://www.foxnews.com/world/2013/07/26/un-human-rights-office-unveils-gay-rights-campaign/#ixzz2aAKW46L0
Never before in the history of the earth has atheism been accepted. The Romans who persecuted the Christians in the first three centuries of the Church felt justified by accusing the Christians of atheism. The Romans truly believed that the Greco-Roman gods were really Gods. They thought the Christians were denying the existence of God because they refused to worship these images. Even though the Roman gods were not really God, at least they acknowledged a "higher power". Every nation had there own higher power - but nowhere on earth did the people believe there was no god at all.
National atheism has never been practiced.Never! It is truly the spirit of Antichrist that opposes all that is called God, or is worshipped. And this spirit of Antichrist has indeed come into the world, and is gaining power by the day. Never before has the world been set up for the persecution of the saints ALL OVER THE WORLD.
Read Come Out of Her My People: Persecution Begins by C.W. Steinle